I decided to post this on #wordpress because....this is where Andrew Baggerly posts and he writes about the Giants. In my head, if I post where he posts, I am somehow more connected to Giants baseball. Look. Most of life is about what we believe to be true, reality optional, so just go with it. I will also be posting on #Blogger and #Tumblr, just in case you prefer that and because I am still hoping I am one hashtag away from fame, book deals, book tours and world travel/domination.
What I have been thinking about a lot the last few days is something my Clinical Supervisor and mentor, Coach Tosh, has been trying to teach me for four years now. The idea of the Middle Path. The idea that two, seemingly opposite, ideas or beliefs can exist in the same mind and heart at the same time. That our tendency to scurry to one side or another is fraught with a false sense of Black and White or Right and Wrong. And by "our" I mean "my", because let's face it, I am probably guiltiest than most of having such strong opinions that I can not for the life of me see the other side, let alone entertain that it is has any possible value.
I have been thinking about this on a bigger-world level since #Ferguson happened and then when I watched the Eric Garner, #icantbreathe video. Followed by the video of 12-year old Tamir Rice being killed. I have been thinking about this on a my-world level as I recently accepted a "supervisory" position that inevitably will put me into positions where I make a decision that staff thinks is lame or that other supervisors thinks is lame or that is just lame. I have been thinking about this on a life-and-death level as I am trying to celebrate the holiday season, which regardless of what you believe is a lot about birth and hope, while facing some other realities about death and grief. I have been thinking about it a lot.
#JonStewart, who I unabashedly love, said this on his show last week and it has become the impetus for this post and what I hope to be a new era of #civility and middle-path-taking in my life. In response to criticism he received, he said:
"Those two ideas are not mutually exclusive". That's the crux of the crux of the all-of-it. I can support law enforcement, appreciate the police, be white and still wonder about brutality, wonder about racism, wonder if we might not be able to do things differently. I can support the right to bear arms and not understand why an every-day citizen needs to go to WalMart with a loaded weapon on their hip. I can be law-abiding and still believe the justice system in this country is in need of some over-haul. I can celebrate the holidays and still wonder if it is really the best idea to have a Clark Griswald house when we are living in a time where we need to reduce consumption. I can be both leader and line staff. These ideas, these roles, are not mutually exclusive. You can laugh and grieve at the same time because all of us, sick or not, are most certainly living and dying at the same time. You can pick both.
On every level of my life politically, professionally and personally, I am noticing my reactivity and a certain pressure to be on one side or another. To feel one way or another, to support choice A or choice Z. And it seems like an entire alphabet is what people want you to believe the two choices are separated by. But most things in life are not really that simple. Often times, the two sides of something are a lot like two sides of the same coin. Totally opposite, but, you can't have one without the other. So you have to figure out a way to have both, to allow both to exist.
So, besides not eating sugar, giving up soda, AND fitting into the clothes Stacey Marie gave me by Valentines day (!), my New Year's resolution is to pick choice M. M is the middle point of the alphabet. The middle-path. It is also the first letter of my first name so it is going to be SUPER easy to remember. Unless I forget my name, which is not totally impossible (the other day, I forgot my address).
The extreme always makes an impression but it is suffocating there. And obvious. And frankly, not really an answer because it always silences another side of something which continues the fight. And I am not sure about much, but I think the goal of any battle, of any conflict, of any argument is to stop fighting and make peace. Find common ground. Find. Both. Take the middle-road, because what is considered the "high" and the "low" roads exist only in context and perspective. Neither of which lend themselves to righteousness or absolutes.
Good luck out there! Loving you.....
